Login / Register Submit Your Article
cover
Article Menu

Journal Browser
Vol. 6 (2024)
Vol. 5 (2023)
Vol. 4 (2022)
Vol. 3 (2021)
Vol. 2 (2020)
Vol. 1 (2019)
Open Access Journal Article

Instructional Design for Online and Blended Learning

by John Martin 1,*
1
John Martin
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
PIE  2022 4(1):28; https://doi.org/10.69610/j.pie.20220414
Received: 25 February 2022 / Accepted: 25 March 2022 / Published Online: 14 April 2022
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

The paper explores the intricacies of instructional design tailored specifically for online and blended learning environments. It begins by providing a comprehensive overview of the unique characteristics of these modes of education and their implications for instructional design. The discussion underscores the importance of aligning instructional strategies with the pedagogical needs of asynchronous and synchronous learning platforms. It delves into the creation of effective learning objectives, the selection of appropriate instructional materials, and the development of engaging assessments that cater to both self-paced and collaborative learning experiences. Furthermore, the paper examines issues related to technology integration, accessibility, and the role of student feedback in continuous improvement of online and blended courses. Through a synthesis of theoretical frameworks and practical insights, the paper argues for a flexible, adaptive approach to instructional design that recognizes the diverse learning styles and needs of students in the digital age.

Keywords: Instructional Design; Online Learning; Blended Learning; Educational Technology; Student Engagement.;
Copyright: © 2022 by Martin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Martin, J. (2022). Instructional Design for Online and Blended Learning. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 4(1), 28. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20220414
ACS Style
Martin, J. Instructional Design for Online and Blended Learning. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 2022, 4, 28. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20220414
AMA Style
Martin J. Instructional Design for Online and Blended Learning. Perspectives in Innovative Education; 2022, 4(1):28. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20220414
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, John 2022. "Instructional Design for Online and Blended Learning" Perspectives in Innovative Education 4, no.1:28. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20220414

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Martin, J. Instructional Design for Online and Blended Learning. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 2022, 4, 28. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20220414
AMA Style
Martin J. Instructional Design for Online and Blended Learning. Perspectives in Innovative Education; 2022, 4(1):28. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20220414
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, John 2022. "Instructional Design for Online and Blended Learning" Perspectives in Innovative Education 4, no.1:28. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20220414
APA style
Martin, J. (2022). Instructional Design for Online and Blended Learning. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 4(1), 28. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20220414

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
  2. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Athabasca University Press.
  3. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical thinking in a technology-based environment: The Community of Inquiry framework. The American Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 1-22.
  4. Borg, M., & Russell, T. (2003). Blended learning: An overview. In L. Y. M. Soh (Ed.), Blended learning: Research and practice in higher education (pp. 3-16). Athabasca University Press.
  5. Garrison, D. R. (2007). Theoretical foundations of blended learning. In P. A. Thompson (Ed.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-22). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Assessment Technology Group. (2001). A taxonomic framework for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
  7. Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2011). Learning and technology: A conceptual framework for designing teaching and learning. In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 1-19). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  8. Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Toward a theory of online learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 5-23.
  9. Hannafin, M. J., Land, S. M., Oliver, R. M., & Lesgold, A. M. (1999). Instructional design theory: Building from the past, looking to the future. Educational Technology, 39(5), 60-68.
  10. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
  11. W3C. (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/