The paper explores the impact of online assessment methods on learning outcomes in the digital era. As educational institutions increasingly adopt e-learning platforms, the effectiveness of online assessments has become a critical area of study. This paper critically examines various online assessment methods, including quizzes, essays, and collaborative projects, and their influence on student learning. Findings indicate that while online assessments offer flexibility and convenience, they also present challenges such as reduced peer interaction and potential for cheating. The study further discusses the importance of incorporating diverse assessment strategies to cater to different learning styles and promotes the use of rubrics and clear feedback mechanisms to enhance the quality of online assessments. Ultimately, the paper advocates for a balanced approach that combines the benefits of online assessments with traditional pedagogical practices to achieve optimal learning outcomes.
Martin, S. (2023). Online Assessment Methods and Learning Outcomes. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 5(1), 36. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230222
ACS Style
Martin, S. Online Assessment Methods and Learning Outcomes. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 2023, 5, 36. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230222
AMA Style
Martin S. Online Assessment Methods and Learning Outcomes. Perspectives in Innovative Education; 2023, 5(1):36. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230222
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, Sarah 2023. "Online Assessment Methods and Learning Outcomes" Perspectives in Innovative Education 5, no.1:36. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230222
Share and Cite
ACS Style
Martin, S. Online Assessment Methods and Learning Outcomes. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 2023, 5, 36. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230222
AMA Style
Martin S. Online Assessment Methods and Learning Outcomes. Perspectives in Innovative Education; 2023, 5(1):36. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230222
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, Sarah 2023. "Online Assessment Methods and Learning Outcomes" Perspectives in Innovative Education 5, no.1:36. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230222
APA style
Martin, S. (2023). Online Assessment Methods and Learning Outcomes. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 5(1), 36. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230222
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
Bonk, C. J., Chen, T. L., Lee, M. J., & Lee, Y. (2000). A constructivist approach to instructional design: An instructional systems design model for an asynchronous learning network. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13(1), 35-56.
Carvalho, L., & Greguras, G. (2002). Evaluating e-learning: A guide to effective practice. Kogan Page.
Chick, J., & Gamble, T. (2000). Using rubrics to improve teaching and learning quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 83-92.
Dziuban, C. D., Moskal, P. D., & Moskal, J. (2000). Online course design: A practical guide. Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the Internet-based environment: Framework, practice, and research. Association for Computing Machinery.
Gagne, R. M., & Meskill, R. D. (1999). Principles of instructional design. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 3-22). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Houghton, J., & Littlejohn, A. (2001). Feedback in asynchronous learning environments: A review of the literature. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(2), 89-108.
Jonassen, D. H., Howland, J. L., Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L., & Wilson, B. G. (2003). Learning with technology: Using, managing, and evaluating computer-based tools for teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. F. (2000). Enhancing reflective thinking and learning through essay writing assignments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(1), 21-34.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyber-space: Effective strategies for the online classroom. Jossey-Bass.
Prince, M. (2004). Does feedback help students learn? Scaffolding processes of inquiry. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(4), 335-349.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Defining instructional design theories and models. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 3-22). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Salmon, G. (2000). E-tivities: The key to e-learning and online teaching. Kogan Page.
Tennyson, R., Sheehan, S., & Bawden, D. (2001). Using information and communication technology to support learning: A focus on e-portfolios. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 45-56.
Wang, Z. (2003). Using essays to assess students' critical thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 141-153.
Weimer, M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. Jossey-Bass.
Wharrad, J., Thompson, J., & Price, S. (2004). Quizzes in an online learning environment: Developing and using feedback to enhance student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 3-17.
