Login / Register Submit Your Article
cover
Article Menu

Journal Browser
Vol. 6 (2024)
Vol. 5 (2023)
Vol. 4 (2022)
Vol. 3 (2021)
Vol. 2 (2020)
Vol. 1 (2019)
Open Access Journal Article

Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education

by Olivia Harris 1,*
1
Olivia Harris
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
PIE  2023 5(1):38; https://doi.org/10.69610/j.pie.20230422
Received: 24 February 2023 / Accepted: 24 March 2023 / Published Online: 22 April 2023
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

The integration of Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) education represents a transformative approach to fostering innovation and critical thinking among students. This paper explores the multifaceted benefits of STEAM education, which emphasize the interconnectivity of these disciplines. The integration of arts and humanities into science and technology education is highlighted as a crucial factor in nurturing creativity and problem-solving skills. Additionally, the paper discusses the challenges faced in implementing STEAM education, such as resource allocation and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. Case studies and empirical evidence are presented to illustrate the positive impact of STEAM programs on student engagement, academic performance, and future career opportunities. The conclusion underscores the importance of fostering a culture of interdisciplinary thinking and the necessity for policy support to promote the widespread adoption of STEAM education.

Keywords: STEAM education; interdisciplinary collaboration; creativity; problem-solving; 21st-century skills.;
Copyright: © 2023 by Harris. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Harris, O. (2023). Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 5(1), 38. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230422
ACS Style
Harris, O. Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 2023, 5, 38. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230422
AMA Style
Harris O. Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education. Perspectives in Innovative Education; 2023, 5(1):38. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230422
Chicago/Turabian Style
Harris, Olivia 2023. "Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education" Perspectives in Innovative Education 5, no.1:38. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230422

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Harris, O. Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 2023, 5, 38. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230422
AMA Style
Harris O. Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education. Perspectives in Innovative Education; 2023, 5(1):38. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230422
Chicago/Turabian Style
Harris, Olivia 2023. "Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education" Perspectives in Innovative Education 5, no.1:38. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230422
APA style
Harris, O. (2023). Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM) Education. Perspectives in Innovative Education, 5(1), 38. doi:10.69610/j.pie.20230422

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Brown, A., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (2008). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 3-14.
  2. National Research Council. (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. National Academies Press.
  3. Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Higher Education. Harvard University Press.
  4. Dถlmeier, D. (2012). Design Thinking as a Method for Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1), 16-22.
  5. Bontis, N., Choo, C. W., and Pham, H. (2005). Managing Intangibles: An Exploratory Analysis. California Management Review, 47(4), 90-112.
  6. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2009). Coordinating Conflict in the Culture of Learning. Educational Psychologist, 44(1), 23-34.
  7. Surry, D., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2008). Project-Based Learning: An Overview of the Research. In R. L. Eitel (Ed.), Designing and Delivering Project-Based Learning (pp. 3-17). Information Age Publishing.
  8. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B., & Baker, D. S. (2002). Dynamic Learning Environments: Technology-Based Systems for Developmental Learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 665-682). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
  10. Ertmer, P. A., Newby, T. J., Limn, M. Y., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2007). Teacher technology change: Impacting classroom practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30(3), 232-242.
  11. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The Flat World and Education: How America's Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. Yale University Press.
  12. Buck, M. D., Callahan, S. M., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2014). The Comprehensive STEM Education Initiative: The Next Generation of STEM Education. Science, 343(6171), 252-253.
  13. Licht, S. (2013). The Power of STEAM Education: How the Arts Can Transform the way Students Learn Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Moore, D., Hill, A. R., & Bond, J. (2011). STEAM Lab: A Catalyst for 21st Century Learning. Cengage Learning.